Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians Match Scorecard – Thrilling 103-Run Victory
The Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians Match Scorecard from IPL 2026 Match 33 tells the story of a one-sided contest that left fans in awe. Sanju Samson’s breathtaking unbeaten century, combined with a disciplined four-wicket haul from Akeal Hosein, dismantled Mumbai Indians comprehensively as CSK cruised to a dominant 103-run victory.
In what stands as one of the most complete performances in this IPL season, the Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians contest was effectively over by halftime. MI, chasing 208, crumbled to 104 all out in 19 overs — a collapse that began in the very first over and never recovered. This Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians Match Scorecard is a must-read for fans who want to relive every moment.
Match Details
| Detail | Info |
|---|---|
| Match | IPL 2026 – Match 33 |
| Date | 22 April 2026 |
| Format | T20 (IPL) |
| Teams | Chennai Super Kings vs Mumbai Indians |
| Venue | IPL 2026 Venue |
| Result | Chennai Super Kings won by 103 runs |
| Player of the Match | Sanju Samson (101* off 54 balls) |
Match Summary Table
| Team | Runs | Wickets | Overs | Run Rate | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chennai Super Kings | 207 | 6 | 20 | 10.35 | Won by 103 runs |
| Mumbai Indians | 104 | 10 | 19 | 5.47 | Lost |
CSK posted a massive 207/6 on the back of Sanju Samson’s 101* and late fireworks from Jamie Overton and Dewald Brevis. Mumbai Indians were never in the chase, collapsing in clusters — losing 3 wickets inside the first 3 overs and folding for just 104 in 19 overs. This edition of the Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians Match Scorecard reflects total dominance in all three departments by CSK.
Chennai Super Kings – Full Batting Scorecard
CSK Innings: 207/6 (20 overs) | RR: 10.35
| # | Batter | Dismissal | R | B | M | 4s | 6s | SR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sanju Samson † | not out | 101 | 54 | 109 | 10 | 6 | 187.03 |
| 2 | Ruturaj Gaikwad (c) | c Tilak Varma b Ghazanfar | 22 | 14 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 157.14 |
| 3 | Sarfaraz Khan | b Santner | 14 | 8 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 175.00 |
| 4 | Shivam Dube | b Ghazanfar | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 62.50 |
| 5 | Dewald Brevis | c Bumrah b Ashwani Kumar | 21 | 11 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 190.90 |
| 6 | Kartik Sharma | c Santner b Bumrah | 18 | 19 | 27 | 0 | 2 | 94.73 |
| 7 | Jamie Overton | c Naman Dhir b Ashwani Kumar | 15 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 214.28 |
| 8 | Akeal Hosein | not out | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 |
| DNB | Noor Ahmad | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| DNB | Anshul Kamboj | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| DNB | Mukesh Choudhary | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| DNB | Gurjapneet Singh | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Extras: lb 1, nb 3, w 5 = 9
Total: 207/6 (20 overs, RR: 10.35)
Fall of Wickets – CSK
| Wkt | Score | Batter | Over |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | 32 | Ruturaj Gaikwad | 2.6 |
| 2nd | 72 | Sarfaraz Khan | 5.4 |
| 3rd | 91 | Shivam Dube | 8.1 |
| 4th | 122 | Dewald Brevis | 10.6 |
| 5th | 165 | Kartik Sharma | 16.5 |
| 6th | 181 | Jamie Overton | 17.6 |
Sanju Samson was the undisputed anchor and aggressor in the same innings. He rebuilt partnerships after every fall of wicket, and his century — his first for CSK in IPL 2026 — came off just 52 balls. Dewald Brevis and Jamie Overton contributed explosive cameos in the back half of the innings to push CSK past 200.
Read Also: Lucknow Super Giants Vs Royal Challengers Bengaluru Match Scorecard
CSK Bowling vs Mumbai Indians – Bowling Figures Table (MI Innings)
MI Innings: 104 all out (19 overs) | RR: 5.47
| # | Batter | Dismissal | R | B | M | 4s | 6s | SR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quinton de Kock † | b Mukesh Choudhary | 7 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 70.00 |
| 2 | Danish Malewar | c †Samson b Hosein | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 3 | Naman Dhir | b Hosein | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 4 | Suryakumar Yadav | c Khan b Hosein | 36 | 30 | 69 | 5 | 0 | 120.00 |
| 5 | Tilak Varma | b Hosein | 37 | 29 | 53 | 5 | 0 | 127.58 |
| 6 | Hardik Pandya (c) | c Mukesh Choudhary b Noor Ahmad | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 50.00 |
| 7 | Sherfane Rutherford | c Kamboj b Noor Ahmad | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
| 8 | Shardul Thakur | c Brevis b Kamboj | 6 | 12 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 50.00 |
| 9 | Krish Bhagat | c Gurjapneet Singh b Overton | 7 | 15 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 46.66 |
| 10 | Ashwani Kumar | not out | 1 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 16.66 |
| 11 | Jasprit Bumrah | c †Samson b Gurjapneet Singh | 2 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 40.00 |
Extras: lb 1, w 6 = 7
Total: 104 all out (19 overs, RR: 5.47)
Fall of Wickets – MI
| Wkt | Score | Batter | Over |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | 7 | Danish Malewar | 0.6 |
| 2nd | 7 | Quinton de Kock | 1.5 |
| 3rd | 11 | Naman Dhir | 2.3 |
| 4th | 84 | Tilak Varma | 11.5 |
| 5th | 85 | Hardik Pandya | 12.1 |
| 6th | 85 | Sherfane Rutherford | 12.2 |
| 7th | 87 | Suryakumar Yadav | 13.1 |
| 8th | 100 | Krish Bhagat | 16.6 |
| 9th | 100 | Shardul Thakur | 17.1 |
| 10th | 104 | Jasprit Bumrah | 18.6 |
MI’s innings was a catalogue of collapse. After a brief partnership between Suryakumar (36) and Tilak Varma (37) gave fans hope at 84/3, the middle order imploded — losing 5 wickets for just 3 runs between overs 12 and 13. The tail could do nothing after that.
Bowling Figures
CSK Bowling (vs MI)
| Bowler | O | M | R | W | Econ | 0s | WD | NB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akeal Hosein | 4 | 1 | 17 | 4 | 4.25 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| Mukesh Choudhary | 4 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 7.75 | 11 | 3 | 0 |
| Anshul Kamboj | 3 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 3.33 | 12 | 1 | 0 |
| Noor Ahmad | 4 | 0 | 24 | 2 | 6.00 | 9 | 1 | 0 |
| Jamie Overton | 2 | 0 | 14 | 1 | 7.00 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Gurjapneet Singh | 2 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 3.50 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Akeal Hosein was the standout bowler — his 4/17 in 4 overs was the decisive blow. Hosein struck twice in his first over (Malewar and Dhir for ducks) and two more times through the middle. Kamboj (3.33 econ) and Gurjapneet (3.50 econ) were equally miserly in supporting roles. Noor Ahmad removed Hardik Pandya and Rutherford in consecutive balls to seal the coffin at 85.
MI Bowling (vs CSK)
| Bowler | O | M | R | W | Econ | 0s | WD | NB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasprit Bumrah | 4 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 7.75 | 10 | 0 | 2 |
| Hardik Pandya | 2 | 0 | 38 | 0 | 19.00 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| AM Ghazanfar | 4 | 0 | 25 | 2 | 6.25 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Mitchell Santner | 4 | 0 | 44 | 1 | 11.00 | 8 | 2 | 0 |
| Ashwani Kumar | 4 | 0 | 37 | 2 | 9.25 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
| Krish Bhagat | 2 | 0 | 31 | 0 | 15.50 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Despite picking up 6 wickets between the team, MI’s bowling was expensive. Hardik Pandya’s 2 overs went for 38 (econ: 19.00) and Krish Bhagat’s 2 overs cost 31. Only Ghazanfar (6.25 econ, 2 wkts) and Bumrah (7.75 econ, 1 wkt) looked remotely threatening, but they simply couldn’t stop Samson’s onslaught.
Key Moments & Tactical Analysis
Toss Impact:
The toss played a significant role. Batting first on what appeared to be a true surface, CSK made full use of favourable conditions in the powerplay, establishing early momentum with Gaikwad and Samson.
Powerplay Momentum:
CSK scored 72/2 in the first 6 overs — a competitive start driven by Samson and Gaikwad’s 32-run opening stand. Despite losing Gaikwad in over 2 and Sarfaraz at over 5, Samson held firm. MI, by contrast, lost 3 wickets inside 3 overs for just 11 runs in their powerplay — a hole they could never climb out of.
Turning Point:
The turning point came in the 12th and 13th overs of MI’s chase. At 84/3, there was a theoretical chance for the home side. But Noor Ahmad dismissed Hardik Pandya and Rutherford off consecutive deliveries (over 12), and Hosein sent back Suryakumar in the very next over. 5 wickets for 3 runs ended the contest.
Captaincy Decisions:
Ruturaj Gaikwad’s decision to deploy Hosein early in the powerplay — despite being a spin option — was inspired. Hosein’s 4-wicket burst with maiden over control suffocated MI before they could settle. Hardik Pandya’s decision to bowl himself — going for 38 in 2 overs — backfired significantly.
Pitch/Dew Factor:
The pitch appeared to offer good carry for batting in the first innings. Any dew in the second innings was irrelevant, as CSK’s bowlers — led by Hosein — generated sharp turn and pace variation that MI’s top and middle order simply couldn’t counter.
Key Stats Table
| Metric | CSK | MI |
|---|---|---|
| Total Runs | 207/6 | 104 |
| Overs Played | 20 | 19 |
| Run Rate | 10.35 | 5.47 |
| Extras | 9 (lb 1, nb 3, w 5) | 7 (lb 1, w 6) |
| Boundaries (4s) | 19 | 10 |
| Sixes (6s) | 12 | 1 |
| Highest Score | Samson 101* | Tilak Varma 37 |
| Best Bowling | Hosein 4/17 | Ghazanfar 2/25 |
| Dot Balls | – (CSK batting) | 14 (Hosein alone) |
CSK smashed 12 sixes to MI’s 1 — a staggering disparity that captures how completely the two teams played. CSK’s 19 fours and 12 sixes produced a boundaries-based run rate well above 12 per over. MI’s inability to find the boundary (only 10 fours and a solitary six) left their chase dead in the water from the opening powerplay itself.
Head-to-Head Analysis
| Metric | Details |
|---|---|
| Total IPL Matches Played | 36 |
| CSK Wins | 20 |
| MI Wins | 16 |
| Most Runs (CSK) | MS Dhoni (historical) |
| Most Wickets (MI) | Lasith Malinga (historical) |
| Largest CSK Win | 103 runs – IPL 2026 Match 33 (this match) |
| Last 5 Meetings | CSK lead 3–2 |
Note: All-time H2H figures are approximate and subject to official IPL record updates.
Historical Rivalry
The Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians rivalry is the most celebrated and fiercely contested in the history of the Indian Premier League. Known as the “El Clásico of Indian cricket,” these two franchises have met more times than any other pairing in IPL history, with championships, finals, and playoff thrillers making up the fabric of this iconic Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians Timeline.
CSK, led for most of their history by MS Dhoni, and MI, built around Rohit Sharma’s captaincy legacy and now Hardik Pandya, represent the gold standard of IPL cricket. Both sides have won five IPL titles each — making every Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians encounter a clash of champions.
The Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians Players over the years — from Dhoni, Raina, and Jadeja to Tendulkar, Pollard, and Malinga — have made this the most-watched fixture in the IPL calendar. Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians Stats show that despite the competitive edge, this 2026 encounter was among the most lopsided, a reminder that form and momentum can tip even the greatest of rivalries decisively.
Where To Watch Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians
For those asking where to watch Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians in the future, IPL 2026 matches are broadcast on Star Sports (India), with live streaming available on JioCinema in India. International viewers can access matches on Willow TV (US/Canada) and Sky Sports (UK). Check your local broadcaster for regional coverage of upcoming Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians Matches.
Conclusion
The Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians Match Scorecard from IPL 2026 Match 33 will be remembered as one of the most one-sided El Clásico encounters in recent memory. Sanju Samson’s maiden IPL century for CSK was the centrepiece, but the collective brilliance — from Hosein’s 4-for to Kamboj’s miserly spell — made this a complete team performance.
For MI, this loss deepens their IPL 2026 woes and raises serious questions about middle-order fragility and bowling discipline. For CSK, this result bolsters their Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians Standings position significantly, pushing them higher up the IPL 2026 points table. The next Chennai Super Kings Vs Mumbai Indians clash will be eagerly anticipated by fans on both sides.
? FAQs
What was the final score?
CSK scored 207/6 in 20 overs; MI were all out for 104 in 19 overs. CSK won by 103 runs.
Who was Player of the Match?
Sanju Samson – 101* off 54 balls (10 fours, 6 sixes, SR: 187.03).
Who scored most runs?
Sanju Samson for CSK with 101*; Tilak Varma (37) and Suryakumar Yadav (36) were MI’s highest scorers.
Who took most wickets?
Akeal Hosein (CSK) took 4/17 in 4 overs — the best figures of the match.
What was the turning point?
Noor Ahmad removing Hardik Pandya and Rutherford off consecutive balls in over 12, collapsing MI from 84/3 to 85/6 in the space of two deliveries.
